This math investigation follows the 5 phase model of mathematical arguments, and is designed for Kindergarten age students. This task is based off of the Common Core State Standard: (CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.K.NBT.A.1) Compose and decompose numbers from 11 to 19 into ten ones and some further ones, e.g., by using objects or drawings, and record each composition or decomposition by a drawing or equation (such as 18 = 10 + 8); understand that these numbers are composed of ten ones and one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, or nine ones.
Phase 1 – Noticing Regularity
19=10+9
18=10+8
17=10+7
16=10+6
15=10+5
Teacher: What do you notice? What do you see happening here?
Student: I see that the number 10 is in all of them
Student: I see that the numbers are going down over here, like 9, 8, 7…
Student: I see that it says 19 and then has a 9, and 18 with an 8…
Student: I see the numbers are being taken apart into 10 and then the leftovers. Like 19 has 10 and 9 left over, and 18 has 10 and 8 left over…
Phase 2 – Articulating a claim
Teacher: Now that we see the way these number sentences are changing each time, we need to come up with a statement or a rule that they follow. Does this make sense? This sentence must be true, and we should make sure that it works for all five of the sentence that are on the board. We are first going to work with our triangle partners, and then come back together on the carpet to hear what you and your partners came up with.
Pair 1: All the number sentences have 10 in them
Pair 2: The numbers on this side are going down on that side
Pair 3: Where it says 19, that sentence has 9 on the other side, where it says 18, that one has 8 on the other side, and that happens for all of them
Pair 4: We can take apart the big numbers like 19, into 10 and the ones that are left over which is 9
Phase 3 – Investigating through representations
Students will work together in their groups to create representations of their statements. They will be allowed to use unifix cubes, snap cubes, counting bears, and paper/pencil.
Teacher: Now that you and your group have worked together to come up with a statement, you get to use manipulatives or paper to prove that your statement is true and that it fits all of our number sentences on the board. You may use unifix cubes, snap cubes, counting bears, and paper. I will be walking around during work time to check on each group.
Phase 4 – Constructing arguments
Groups of students will take turns sharing out their ideas and how their representation shows their statements to be true for the original number sentences. This is where the idea of “mathematical argument” comes into play as students will contribute different pieces of information and build upon each others explanations. We will then come together and collaboratively create a complete idea/solution.
Teacher: After hearing everyone’s statements, is there one or maybe even two, that fit our number sentences the best? What do they have in common? Do they both prove to be true? Which sentence could we change, or add to, to make it more specific?
Phase 5 – Comparing operations
Does this work for subtraction too?
Teacher: Do you think that we can take numbers apart in a similar way? Can we start with a large number, and subtract 10 to get leftovers?
19-10=9
18-10=8
17-10=7
16-10=6
15-10=5
Teacher: What do you notice? What do you see happening here?
Student: They still all have the number 10
Student: The numbers on the side are still going backwards, like 9, 8, 7…
Student: It still has a big number like 19 and then has a 9, and 18 with an 8…
Student: The numbers are still being taken apart into 10 and then the leftovers. Because it still has a large number, you take away 10, and there are leftovers that match the leftovers from when we added numbers.
NCTM questions:
Gathering information: helping students make sense of the information that is prior knowledge
Probing thinking: questions that help students clarify and explain their thinking (What do you notice? What do you see happening here?)
Making math visible: students are active in learning, while teacher is available to assess levels of understanding and comprehension
Reflection and justification: deep levels of thinking, reasoning, and understanding are occurring in order to produce mathematical arguments
NCTM Effective teaching practices:
Implement tasks that promote reasoning and problem solving (by engaging students in problem solving and discussing the task)
Use and connect mathematical representations (by making connections using mathematical representations, which deepen understanding of mathematics concepts)
Facilitate meaningful mathematical discourse (by creating discussion opportunities among students for sharing ideas, approaches, and arguments to mathematical tasks)
Pose purposeful questions (to assess and understanding students’ reasoning and sense making about mathematical concepts)
Support productive struggle in learning mathematics (by supporting students individually and collaboratively, as they engage in mathematical struggles)
Before reading, But Why Does It Work, I had never heard of the 5 phase model of mathematical arguments. I think this model is a great way for students to become active in their learning, and to develop a mathematical mindset. It gives them responsibility, and I am a firm believer in working collaboratively with peers. It may sound cheesy but I cannot wait to try this with my Kindergarteners, when we begin decomposing numbers into tens and ones!